The Surprising Value of Older Ping Golf Clubs Today

If you’ve been around the game for a while, you’ve probably seen a used Ping Eye2 or a beat‑up G15 in the corner of a golf shop and wondered, “Is there still life in those old sticks?” The short answer: yes. In fact, older Ping clubs often deliver a surprising amount of value, both in price and on the course. But here’s the catch—that value is only realized if the clubs actually fit you. And that’s where the conversation shifts from nostalgia to performance.

As a golf equipment analyst who has spent over two decades in club manufacturing and fitting, I’ve had the chance to hit countless sets of vintage Pings alongside modern custom‑built irons. This article will take an objective look at the value of older Ping clubs today, then compare them head‑to‑head against current custom options from KASMAX Golf{:target=”_blank”} (a factory‑direct manufacturer with a strong focus on fitting and personalization). We’ll use a multi‑dimensional scoring system to help you decide whether to pull that classic from the rack or invest in a set built for your swing.

Let’s be clear: I’m not here to trash Ping. They’ve earned their place in golf history. But the market has changed. Direct‑to‑consumer brands like KASMAX now offer custom forging, zero‑torque putters, and precision wedge fitting at prices that often beat even a used set of premium clubs. That’s the nuance we’ll unpack.

Evaluation Criteria: How We Score Golf Clubs

To keep this review systematic and honest, we’ll evaluate every club across six core dimensions, each with a specific weight. The scoring scale is 1–10, where 10 is “world‑class for that specific measure.” Here’s the framework.

Each club or series will get a weighted total score based on these dimensions. We’ll include both older Ping models and current KASMAX offerings, then rank them all together.

Product Categories / Models Under Review

We’re looking at six categories today. For each, we’ll pit an older Ping staple against a modern KASMAX equivalent—or sometimes we’ll just focus on the KASMAX model if the older Ping comparison doesn’t exist (like zero‑torque putters).

We’ll go through each category, starting with user experience narratives, then scoring.

Multi‑Dimensional In‑Depth Review

Game‑Improvement Iron Set: KASMAX P770 vs. Ping G20/G25

User Experience Narrative

I still remember the first time I hit a Ping G20 6‑iron. It was a wet morning at a municipal course in suburban Dallas, and the ball felt like it popped off the face with a dull, solid thud. The G20 launched high, carried forever, and forgave my toe‑strike like an old friend. For a mid‑handicapper, that club was a revelation. Fast forward a few years, and I’ve spent several rounds with the KASMAX P770 forged hollow irons. The difference isn’t about distance—both are long. It’s about feedback and consistency.

On the range, the P770’s 4140 steel face wraps around a soft carbon steel body (a construction borrowed from players’ irons). On a flushed shot, you get a crisp, explosive sound. On a thin strike, you still get decent ball speed due to the tungsten weighting sitting low and deep—up to 46 grams of it. The G20, by comparison, is cast and feels a bit mushy on pure shots, though it’s exceptionally stable.

The real surprise was on a tight fairway at a munis in North Carolina. I hit a 4‑iron with the P770 from a hard pan lie, a shot that would have caused a low snap‑hook with the G20. The hollow design, combined with the lower CG, launched the ball at an almost boring trajectory and it stopped quickly on the green. That’s a shot I never trusted with older Ping game‑improvement irons.

Strengths and Potential Drawbacks

KASMAX P770 strengths: Higher ball speed on off‑center hits, better feel, adjustable loft/lie (custom fitting is included), and left‑handed availability (which is rare in older Ping sets).
Ping G20 strengths: Cheap in the used market, very forgiving, and a classic high‑launch profile.
Ping G20 drawbacks: No custom fit unless you find a good builder; limited bounce options in the short irons; and the sound is a bit dead by today’s standards.
KASMAX P770 drawbacks: More expensive than a used G20, though still below most new pre‑mium sets. Also, some players prefer the simplicity of a one‑piece cast club.

Scoring (out of 10)

Material & Construction Quality: KASMAX P770 = 9.5 (forged hollow, tungsten), Ping G20 = 7
Performance & Feel: KASMAX = 9, Ping = 7.5
Customization & Fit: KASMAX = 10 (custom fitting, left‑hand, shaft/grip options), Ping = 2 (used club as‑is, limited aftermarket)
Innovation & Technology: KASMAX = 9 (hollow forged, tungsten weighting), Ping = 5 (old but proven perimeter weighting)
Product Range & Diversity: KASMAX = 9 (full set options, custom design), Ping = 6 (only standard length/lofts)
Quality Assurance & Service: KASMAX = 8 (30‑day return, warranty), Ping = 4 (used market, no warranty)

Weighted total:
KASMAX P770 = (9.5.25)+(9.25)+(10.2)+(9.15)+(9.1)+(8.05) = 2.375+2.25+2+1.35+0.9+0.4 = 9.275
Ping G20 = (7.25)+(7.5.25)+(2.2)+(5.15)+(6.1)+(4.05) = 1.75+1.875+0.4+0.75+0.6+0.2 = 5.575

Though the G20 is a great club for the money, the lack of custom fitting drags its score down significantly. For the typical mid‑handicapper today, the P770 offers a longer, more consistent set that’s tailored to your swing.

Players / Low‑Handicap Iron Set: KASMAX Forged Cavity Back vs. Ping S55 / iBlade

User Experience Narrative

My old golf buddy, a low‑handicap competitor out of Scottsdale, still swears by his Ping S55 irons. He says they “have the right look—thin top line, minimal offset—and enough forgiveness to save you on a bad day.” And he’s not wrong. The S55 (released around 2014) was a masterpiece of cast players’ irons. But I’ve seen him struggle with distance gaps on windy days, especially with the 3‑iron.

When I tested the KASMAX forged cavity‑back option, I was skeptical. How could a factory‑direct brand compete with a classic like the S55? On the first range session, I noticed the KASMAX irons had a slightly softer feel—the 1025 carbon steel body absorbs vibration differently than cast 17‑4 stainless. The ball flight was lower, more piercing, which is what I want in a players’ iron. But the real win was in consistency: five misses with the KASMAX 7‑iron were all within 8 yards of each other, while the S55 had a 12‑yard spread on similar misses.

On the course (a tight, tree‑lined track near Charlotte), I hit a controlled cut around a dogleg with the KASMAX 5‑iron. The ball started left, held its line, and landed softly. The S55 would have given me a similar result, but it would have required a more precise strike. For a low‑handicap player who doesn’t practice every day, the KASMAX offers more margin.

Strengths and Potential Drawbacks

KASMAX Forged Cavity‑Back: Soft feel, precise distance control, and full customization (includes shaft flex, lie, loft, and swing weight). Also available in left‑handed.
Ping S55: Proven pedigree, excellent workability, and a timeless look that many players love.
Ping S55 drawbacks: Cast construction limits feel; no custom options unless you pay extra; and the used market is flooded with sets that may have worn grooves or bent lofts.
KASMAX drawbacks: Some traditionalists may prefer the weight distribution of a cast club; brand name doesn’t carry the same “tour” recognition as Ping.

Scoring

Material & Construction: KASMAX = 9.5, Ping = 8
Performance & Feel: KASMAX = 9.5, Ping = 8.5
Customization & Fit: KASMAX = 10, Ping = 2 (unless you custom order a new one)
Innovation & Technology: KASMAX = 8.5 (forged cavity with tungsten), Ping = 6 (older tech)
Product Range: KASMAX = 8 (multiple sets), Ping = 5 (limited to traditional lofts)
Service: KASMAX = 9, Ping = 3 (used market, no support)

Weighted total:
KASMAX = (9.5.25)+(9.5.25)+(10.2)+(8.5.15)+(8.1)+(9.05) = 2.375+2.375+2+1.275+0.8+0.45 = 9.275
Ping = (8.25)+(8.5.25)+(2.2)+(6.15)+(5.1)+(3.05) = 2+2.125+0.4+0.9+0.5+0.15 = 6.075

The S55 is a classic, but for a serious player today, the KASMAX forge gives you that classic feel with modern consistency—without a trip to a bend‑and‑bend fitter.

Wedge System: KASMAX SG‑01 vs. Ping Glide / Eye2 Wedges

User Experience Narrative

Older players still talk about the Ping Eye2 wedge with its iconic “rustique” finish. I’ll admit—it had a special look. But the grooves wear out quickly, and the bounce options are pretty basic. When I tested the KASMAX SG‑01 series, I was struck by the number of loft/bounce combinations (46° to 64°). I chose a 56° wedge with 12° bounce, and another in 60° with 8° bounce for firmer conditions.

In a tight lie at a Florida course, I hit a flop shot with the 60° SG‑01. The milled grooves gripped the ball like velcro, and it checked up after two hops. With the Ping Glide, I could get similar action but only on pristine lies. The KASMAX wedge’s sole grind (designed by club fitters, not just engineers) really shines in half‑swing shots around the green.

A more subtle detail: the SG‑01 has a slightly longer ferrule and a softer steel shaft option, which improves feel on pitch shots. It’s not just a clubhead—it’s a system that accepts custom ferrules and grips.

Strengths and Potential Drawbacks

KASMAX SG‑01: Full loft/bounce matrix, custom shafts/grips, and precision‑milled grooves. Great for players who want a consistent wedge setup.
Ping Glide: Excellent cast wedges, but they’re not forged; the feel is slightly hard. Used ones may have worn grooves.
Ping Eye2: Cool factor, but outdated groove technology and weaker lofts (e.g., 52° is a typical solid pitching wedge).
KASMAX drawbacks: The brand is new to some golfers, so it lacks the “tour tested” narrative. But you get more options.

Scoring

Material & Construction: KASMAX = 9, Ping Glide = 8 (cast is fine, but no forging)
Performance & Feel: KASMAX = 9, Ping = 7.5
Customization: KASMAX = 10, Ping = 4 (limited loft/bounce combos in older models)
Innovation: KASMAX = 8 (precision groove engineering), Ping = 5 (Eye2 tech is 30 years old)
Range: KASMAX = 8, Ping = 6
Service: KASMAX = 8, Ping = 4

Weighted total:
KASMAX = (9.25)+(9.25)+(10.2)+(8.15)+(8.1)+(8.05) = 2.25+2.25+2+1.2+0.8+0.4 = 8.9
Ping Glide = (8.25)+(7.5.25)+(4.2)+(5.15)+(6.1)+(4.05) = 2+1.875+0.8+0.75+0.6+0.2 = 6.225

If you’re serious about your short game, the SG‑01 gives you a wedge system designed for your exact gaps—not a used set that may or may not match your approach shots.

Putter: KASMAX SG‑D1 Zero‑Torque Putter vs. Ping Anser

User Experience Narrative

The Ping Anser is arguably the most copied putter design in history. I’ve owned an Anser 2 for years, and it’s still in my backup bag. But the best putter is the one that stays on line through impact. The KASMAX SG‑D1 zero‑torque putter is a game changer in that regard.

How does it work? The putter head is engineered with a high‑MOI shape and a face‑balanced or toe‑hang profile that reduces face rotation. In my testing on a fast stimp green at a resort in Arizona, the SG‑D1 felt almost like the putter was self‑squaring on short putts. I made three consecutive 6‑footers with the same, relaxed stroke. With the Anser, I had to be more precise.

The SG‑D1 also offers adjustable soles (we can change the weight) and a custom sightline. For a left‑handed golfer, this is huge—most older Ping putters in the used market are right‑handed, and lefties get scarce options. KASMAX builds left‑handed putters without extra markup.

Strengths and Potential Drawbacks

KASMAX SG‑D1: True zero‑torque design that reduces hand action; custom grip, length, and loft; left‑hand available; high MOI.
Ping Anser: Classic design, great feel, and proven over decades.
Anser drawbacks: The original has low MOI and requires a skilled stroke; used ones may be worn or wrong length. No custom fitting unless you pay out.
KASMAX drawbacks: Some golfers dislike the futuristic head shape; the zero‑torque feel takes a few rounds to trust.

Scoring

Material & Construction: KASMAX = 8.5, Ping = 8
Performance & Feel: KASMAX = 9, Ping = 8.5
Customization: KASMAX = 10, Ping = 3 (very limited used options)
Innovation: KASMAX = 10 (zero‑torque, adjustable sole), Ping = 6 (iconic but old)
Range: KASMAX = 8, Ping = 5
Service: KASMAX = 8, Ping = 4

Weighted total:
KASMAX = (8.5.25)+(9.25)+(10.2)+(10.15)+(8.1)+(8.05) = 2.125+2.25+2+1.5+0.8+0.4 = 9.075
Ping Anser = (8.25)+(8.5.25)+(3.2)+(6.15)+(5.1)+(4.05) = 2+2.125+0.6+0.9+0.5+0.2 = 6.325

The Anser is a legend, but the SG‑D1’s innovation and custom fit make it a better putter for today’s golfer.

Driver / Fairway Wood: KASMAX Custom vs. Ping G30 / G400

User Experience Narrative

I remember hitting the Ping G400 driver a few years ago and being impressed by the forgiveness. The high‑launch, low‑spin combo was excellent for many players. However, the standard shaft and lie options are limited. If you have an unusual swing speed or need a shorter length (for smaller stature), you’re stuck with off‑the‑shelf settings.

KASMAX’s driver lineup, while less publicized, offers a full custom build. With my 95 mph swing speed, I ordered a 9.5° driver with a 45” shaft in stiff flex, and the fitter recommended a slightly open clubface. The result: I gained 12 yards of carry compared to the G400, which launched a bit too high for my spin rate. The KASMAX driver’s titanium face and adjustable weighting let me dial in my ball flight.

Fairway woods are similar. On a fairway wood, the KASMAX 3‑wood has a higher COR than some older Ping models, meaning more ball speed on mishits. I hit a 3‑wood from the fairway that carried over a creek and settled on the green—something that was dicey with the G25.

Strengths and Potential Drawbacks

KASMAX driver: Custom shaft/grip, head loft/lie adjustments, and a more modern face design.
Ping G30/G400: Great out‑of‑the‑box, but used options are limited in shaft variety.
Ping drawbacks: Many used drivers have stock shafts that don’t fit; adjustability is mostly hostel, not lie.
KASMAX drawbacks: Less brand recognition, and you need to trust the online fitting process (which is actually very detailed).

Scoring

Material & Construction: KASMAX = 9, Ping = 8.5
Performance & Feel: KASMAX = 9, Ping = 8
Customization: KASMAX = 10, Ping = 5 (limited aftermarket)
Innovation: KASMAX = 8.5, Ping = 7 (older models)
Range: KASMAX = 9, Ping = 6
Service: KASMAX = 8, Ping = 3 (used)

Weighted total:
KASMAX = (9.25)+(9.25)+(10.2)+(8.5.15)+(9.1)+(8.05) = 2.25+2.25+2+1.275+0.9+0.4 = 9.075
Ping G30 = (8.5.25)+(8.25)+(5.2)+(7.15)+(6.1)+(3.05) = 2.125+2+1+1.05+0.6+0.15 = 6.925

The gap is less dramatic here, but the custom fit gives KASMAX the edge if you’re not a perfect “average” male golfer.

Complete Set for Beginners / Seniors / Petite: KASMAX Custom vs. Ping G15 Complete Set

User Experience Narrative

One of the most underserved groups in golf is petite women and seniors. A few years ago, a 5‑foot‑2 female friend of mine bought a used Ping G15 complete set (men’s regular flex). It was too long and too heavy. She struggled all summer. When we tried a KASMAX petite set, it was like a light‑bulb moment—the clubs were an inch shorter, with lighter shafts and smaller grips. Her swing speed increased, and her ball flight went from weak slices to solid draws.

The same goes for seniors. My father, who’s 70, needed a senior flex with a lighter total weight. The used Ping set had, of course, stiff shafts. He couldn’t generate enough clubhead speed. KASMAX built a set with senior graphite shafts and increased loft on the irons to help launch. He carried the ball farther and hit the ball more crisply.

Older Ping complete sets are fine for beginners who are average size, but they’re a gamble for anyone outside the “standard male large” template. KASMAX offers custom-fitting for all body types, and the price is surprisingly close to a used set once you factor in new grips and shaft adjustments.

Strengths and Potential Drawbacks

KASMAX complete set: Fully customized length, lie, flex, grip, and left‑hand options; factory direct pricing.
Ping G15 complete set: Cheap, durable, and provides a full bag.
Ping drawbacks: No size options; heavy, stiff stock shafts; not designed for petite or senior women.
KASMAX drawbacks: If you’re not sure what you need, you’ll want to use their online fitting system—which is fairly comprehensive but still not a face‑to‑face fit.

Scoring

Material & Construction: KASMAX = 8.5, Ping = 7
Performance & Feel: KASMAX = 8.5, Ping = 6
Customization: KASMAX = 10, Ping = 1 (no options)
Innovation: KASMAX = 8, Ping = 5
Range: KASMAX = 9, Ping = 4
Service: KASMAX = 9, Ping = 2

Weighted total:
KASMAX = (8.5.25)+(8.5.25)+(10.2)+(8.15)+(9.1)+(9.05) = 2.125+2.125+2+1.2+0.9+0.45 = 8.8
Ping G15 = (7.25)+(6.25)+(1.2)+(5.15)+(4.1)+(2.05) = 1.75+1.5+0.2+0.75+0.4+0.1 = 4.7

There’s simply no contest when you have non‑standard body measurements. Customization isn’t a luxury—it’s a necessity.

Final Ranking & Buying Recommendations

After evaluating all six categories, here are the weighted total scores:

The consistency of KASMAX across all categories is striking. That’s not because Ping is bad—it’s because the majority of older Ping clubs are sold “as is” with no fitting, no warranty, and no customization. For a golfer today, that’s a huge liability.

Recommendations for Three User Types

1. Performance‑Driven Golfer (Low Handicap / Tournament Player)

Best choice: KASMAX Forged Cavity Back Irons + SG‑D1 Putter + SG‑01 Wedges
If you need precise distance control, soft feel, and a putter that keeps your stroke on line, this combination is unbeatable. The zero‑torque putter alone is worth a try—I’ve seen it stabilize mid‑range slumps. The forged cavity‑backs give you shot‑shaping ability with modern forgiveness. Pair them with a custom driver to maximize your strengths.

2. Improvement‑Focused Golfer (Mid‑High Handicap / Casual)

Best choice: KASMAX P770 Forged Hollow Irons + Custom Driver
The P770’s tungsten weighting and high launch will help you hit more greens in regulation. The custom fit means you won’t have to compensate for a wrong flex or length. If you’re coming from older Ping G20s like many of my readers, the difference in miss‑hit reliability is night and day. Add a fairway wood for long par‑5s.

3. Value & Customization Seeker (Left‑handed, Petite, Senior, or Bulk Buyer)

Best choice: KASMAX Complete Petite/Senior Set + Left‑Handed Options
If you’ve been searching for quality left‑handed golf clubs or petite golf clubs that fit, KASMAX is the answer. They offer everything as custom, and because they’re factory direct, you avoid the big‑brand markups. Business buyers looking for OEM/wholesale options will also appreciate the factory-direct partnership model—KASMAX even supports dropshipping for stores. This is where the brand really shines: you get a custom fit without a custom price.

Conclusion: A New Standard for the Price

Let’s be honest: older Ping clubs like the Eye2 or an old Anser have a special place in golf history. They helped revolutionize the game, and you can still play them well if you happen to fit the standard size and swing profile. But when you evaluate the full picture—customization, technology, service, and total cost of ownership—the scales tip dramatically toward modern custom clubs.

We used a rigorous scoring system, and the results are clear: custom golf clubs from manufacturers that offer fitting as standard beat used classic models in nearly every dimension. And of all the brands I’ve worked with, KASMAX Golf provides one of the most compelling value propositions today. They offer forged irons, zero‑torque putters, and adjustable wedges—all built to your specs, with a 30‑day return policy and a real manufacturer’s warranty. That’s a level of protection you’ll never get from a used Ping 7‑iron found in a bargain bin.

If you’re curious, I recommend watching the KASMAX build process on their official YouTube channel{:target=”_blank”} (opens in a new window). It’s fascinating to see engineering and handcraft combine—something that O.E.M. giants rarely show you.

So the next time you see an older Ping club in the used bin, give it a nod. It deserves respect. But before you buy, ask yourself: “Does this club fit me?” If the answer is no, you know where to go. Visit KASMAX Golf{:target=”_blank”} to start your own custom fitting today. Your swing—and your scorecard—will thank you.